Submit manuscript:Please read the guidelines for Authors
The key concern of Tobacco Control is always to supply a forum for research, analysis, commentary, and debate on policies, programmes, and methods which can be prone to further the objectives of a comprehensive tobacco control policy. The introduction should indicate why the research reported or issues discussed are important in terms of controlling tobacco use, and the discussion section should include an analysis of how the research reported contributes to tobacco control objectives in papers submitted for review.
Documents firmly anchored to a policy that is strategic programme context are more likely to be accepted for book. Because the log seeks to attain a readership that is international authors should think about whether their intended submissions target dilemmas or themes, that are probably be of great interest to scientists employed in other countries. Extremely parochial dilemmas, that have few classes for tobacco control policy outside a paper’s local context, are not likely to be provided with high concern. The manuscripts editors will generally speaking perhaps maybe not provide priority that is high:
- Studies of cigarette smoking prevalence as well as its correlates. They are well suitable to nationwide journals. Few individuals residing outside a national nation are interested in whether that nation has 30% or 35% of cigarette smokers.
- Knowledge, attitudes, behaviour (KAB) studies of specific populace groups or medical researchers. Once again, these are better suited to national journals or even to wellness speciality that is professional. Few individuals in other nations are usually thinking about (for instance) whether nurses in a hospital that is regional enthusiastic about helping patients quit. National studies, and the ones using studies that are such original areas are of more interest.
- Reports that evoke unanimous “so what?” responses from the editors. These are documents with findings that seem to hold no importance that is obvious changing policy or training in tobacco control. They frequently show methodological finery, but don’t take us anywhere essential or interesting.
- Advice pieces where in actuality the viewpoints are unoriginal, badly argued, naive or neglect for crucial ethical dilemmas in favor of sloganeering.
- Documents that show the writers have not exposed Tobacco Control and never comprehend its primary concentrate on tobacco control in the place of on tobacco and its particular usage and wellness effects. We have been enthusiastic about such papers, but as long as their writers address the implications of these findings for tobacco control.
- Papers with glaringly obvious, fatal problems that are methodological.
- Documents on topics that need very technical or language that is discipline-specific to be recognized by the almost all visitors.
- Documents that are replications of currently well-established findings or provide little new information.
- Regional studies where in actuality the implications for the journal’s international market are uncertain.
- Reports written for governments or regional wellness authorities that some body thought might be offered custom writings review an instant make-over and submitted as a log paper.
Editorial policy
Tobacco Control adheres towards the greatest criteria concerning its editorial policies on publication ethics, medical misconduct, permission and peer review criteria. To look at all BMJ Journal policies please relate to the BMJ Author Hub policies web page.
Articles are posted under a licence that is exclusive non-exclusive licence for British Crown workers or where BMJ has agreed CC BY is applicable. For people authorities officers or workers acting included in their formal duties, the terms are as mentioned prior to our licence terms. Authors or their employers retain copyright. Start access articles may be reused beneath the regards to the appropriate imaginative Commons licence to facilitate reuse associated with the content; please relate to the Tobacco Control Author Licence when it comes to applicable Creative Commons licences”.
Tobacco industry funded work
Tobacco Control will likely not give consideration to for book documents work that is reporting, in entire or perhaps in component, by a tobacco business or tobacco industry company. Nor will the consider that is journal by writers whom accept tobacco industry financing, including financing for research expenses, for many or element of any author’s income, or other kinds of individual remuneration. For more info, please check this out editorial offering the thinking behind the journal’s policy. Failure to declare interests that are competing distribution, or whenever articles is commissioned, may result in immediate rejection regarding the paper. If your competing interest comes to light after book, Tobacco Control will issue an official modification to or retraction of this entire paper, as appropriate.
Material previously published online
Tobacco Control is happy to start thinking about documents based wholly or perhaps in component on product previously posted on the web. Nonetheless writers should think about an editorial with this topic: Prior book on the net: brand new log policy. The editor keeps the customary directly to make modifications any way you like if essential to reduce, utilizing the approval of this author(s), product accepted for publication. Any written or illustrative product that happens to be published somewhere else must certanly be duly recognized and combined with the penned consent for the copyright owner (this might be the publisher as opposed to the writer).
Fast tracking
Under unique circumstances the place where a paper’s findings have actually instantly relevant policy implications warranting urgent book, manuscripts might be fast tracked prior to the normal queue of documents. If you feel you feel it is of sufficient importance to be handled urgently that you have good reasons why this is true for your paper, please detail these in a cover letter, explaining the importance of your work for the field and the reason. This request doesn’t guarantee that the editors will concur, and just a couple of documents per year will undoubtedly be expedited with this foundation, however it might help the editors to judge the paper’s value within the present context.
Formatting, terms and revised manuscripts
Documents on electric cigarettes should make use of the term cigarettes that are‘electronic on very first use, and after that the abbreviation ‘e-cigarettes’ may be applied. Documents on other delivery that is nicotine may continue steadily to utilize the definition of ‘electronic smoking distribution systems’ accompanied by the abbreviation ‘ENDS’ after very very first usage.
When uploading a revised manuscript, writers also needs to consist of a different manuscript file showcasing the tracked changes to exhibit the editors the real difference through the past variation. The monitored changes document should always be uploaded as a supplementary file.
Analysis reporting gu >
BMJ calls for conformity towards the reporting that is following. Please upload the appropriate finished list for the submission to your study type, and label it “Research checklist”. This can be indicated on the submission form if no relevant checklist is available for your study type.
CONSORT statement – necessary for all randomised managed studies
PRISMA statement – necessary for all systematic reviews
EVEREST statement – Required for many financial evaluations
STARD statement – Required for many research that is diagnostic
STROBE statement – necessary for all observational studies
SQUIRE statement – Required for several quality enhancement studies
Guidance and kinds can be obtained from EQUATOR.
We video that is welcome to come with accepted research articles. These enable authors to physically talk through their work beyond the limitations of a article that is formal improve the user’s understanding. Note that individuals will likely not request you to start thinking about publishing a video abstract until your paper happens to be accepted. Please don’t try to upload a video abstract upon initial distribution of one’s manuscript.
There are lots of tutorials online which could guide the manufacturing of a video clip abstract, using commonly and frequently software that is freely available. Windows film Maker and Apple iMovie will be the many typical examples. Samples of movie abstracts can be obtained from The BMJ. Here are a guidelines that are few making a video clip abstract. Writers might also desire to ask their institution’s press/media office for help.
- Movie abstracts must not keep going longer than 4 moments.
- This content while focusing of this video clip must connect straight to the scholarly research which has been accepted for book, and may maybe maybe not stray beyond the information. We advice you stick to the same framework because the paper itself for example. briefly outline the background/context associated with research, provide your quest goal, outline the techniques used, provide the main element outcomes and then talk about the implications associated with results.
- The presentation and content regarding the video clip must be in a method as well as in terms which is understandable and available to a basic medical audience. The language that is main be English, but we welcome subtitles an additional language. Please avoid jargon that’ll not be acquainted to an extensive audience that is medical and don’t make use of abbreviations.
- Authors frequently talk straight into the digital digital digital camera and/or present a slideshow, but we enable the utilization of other appropriate artistic and material that is audiosuch as for instance animations, movies, nevertheless photographs, figures, infographics). Should you want to make use of product from formerly posted work or off their sources, please receive the appropriate permissions through the publisher that is relevant copyright owner.