Phil Ivey edge-sorting pal Cheng Yin Sun is one of three gamblers suing Foxwoods Casino Resort for over $3 million aussie-pokies.club in withheld winnings. Although Ivey is in a roundabout way involved in the Foxwoods case, Sun and Ivey are both presently the subject of a court case brought by the Borgata in Atlantic City, which is wanting to recover $9.6 million it paid out to the pair carrying out a stint at the mini-baccarat tables in 2012.

Both instances involve the employment of edge-sorting, as well as the debate over its legality, or lack thereof; a presssing issue that is fifty shades of grey, so far as what the law states can be involved. The Borgata says the practice is cheating and is unlawful under state video gaming law; Sun and Ivey say it’s not.

Edge-sorting is a method when the gambler is actually able to look for the value of a card by observing manufacturing that is subtle and asymmetries within the pattern on the trunk, and the skilled edge-sorter can turn the odds in his or her favor to your tune of six or seven percent.

Can it be cheating? Well, there is the sc rub, and we’re likely to find out soon, due to the fact theories of both parties are tested in courts on both sides of the Atlantic. The gamblers claim that they’re using pure ability to caress chances in their benefit (and edge-sorting is no mean feat, requiring freakish abilities of observance), while the casinos are claiming it’s fraud, pure and easy.

$1.6 Million in Stakes Held Straight Back

Since well because the Foxwoods and Borgata cases, Ivey normally suing London’s Crockford’s Casino, which includes withheld $12.1 million Ivey that is following and’s visit here, additionally in 2012. The latest case makes no reference to Ivey, however, and is brought by Sun and two associates, Long Mei Fan and Zong Yang Li. The trio claims that the money owed to them by Foxwoods comprises $1.1 million in winnings and their $1.6 million in stakes.

‘Basically, edge-sorting is possible because some brands of playing cards aren’t cut symmetrically across their backs plus some players are gifted with eyesight keen sufficient to inform the distinction,’ says the suit. ‘If Foxwoods and Foxwoods management knew that plaintiffs were edge-sorting and let them practice their as a type of advantage play anyway, intending to keep their losses when they destroyed although not honor their winnings if they won, this will be intentional fraud.’

Unprecedented

The situations are fascinating as they are entirely without precedent, as expert in gaming legislation Maurice VerStandig underlined recently.

‘Edge sorting falls someplace between card counting and weighted snake eyes, and the law is yet to figure out just where,’ he stated. ‘There isn’t any precedent that is real cases like this, and when the judicial system cannot find precedent, it goes in search of analogy, something that will not much help here, either, because edge sorting is maybe not certainly analogous to anything…’

While Sun’s name differs on the court papers through the Foxwoods case to those of the Borgata, here spelled Cheung Yin Sun instead of Cheng Yin Sun, Marvin Vining, a lawyer representing the Foxwoods plaintiffs, has confirmed they are one and similar.

‘that Cheung can be confirmed by me Yin Sun was also Phil Ivey’s playing partner in mini-baccarat sessions that provided rise to the Borgata lawsuit in New Jersey plus the Crockfords lawsuit in London,’ said Vining. ‘She used different playing partners at Foxwoods, and the circumstances of all of the three lawsuits are somewhat various. But the Foxwoods plaintiffs did employ essentially the type that is same of strategy as involved in the other two legal actions.’